Citation
Chicago:
Aimee Marcereau DeGalan, “Thomas Forster, Portrait of a Woman, 1703,” catalogue entry in Aimee Marcereau DeGalan, Blythe Sobol, and Maggie Keenan, The Starr Collection of Portrait Miniatures, 1500–1850: The Collections of the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, vol. 2, ed. Aimee Marcereau DeGalan (Kansas City, MO: Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, 2024), https://doi.org/10.37764/8322.5.1219.
MLA:
Marcereau DeGalan, Aimee. “Thomas Forster, Portrait of a Woman, 1703,” catalogue entry. Aimee Marcereau DeGalan, Blythe Sobol, and Maggie Keenan. The Starr Collection of Portrait Miniatures, 1500–1850: The Collections of the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, edited by Aimee Marcereau DeGalan, vol. 2, Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, 2024. doi: 10.37764/8322.5.1219.
Artist's Biography
See the artist’s biography in volume 4.
Catalogue Entry
Many histories of limning: “Limning” was derived from the Latin word luminare, meaning to illuminate, and the term also became associated with the Latin miniare, referring to the red lead used in illuminated manuscripts, which were also called limnings. Limning developed as an art form separate from manuscript illumination after the inception of the printing press, when books became more utilitarian and less precious. Eventually limning became associated with other diminutive two-dimensional artworks, such as miniatures, leading to the misnomer that “miniature” refers to the size of the object and not its origins in manuscript illumination. Limning is distinct from painting not only by its medium, with the use of watercolor and vellum traditionally used for manuscript illuminations, but also by the typically small size of such works. in Britain characterize the end of the seventeenth century as a period of decline.1Katherine Coombs makes this point in The Portrait Miniature in England (1998; repr., London: Victoria and Albert Publications, 2005), 76. With the exception of Peter Cross (ca. 1645–1724), who continued to work until 1724, the majority of practitioners, including Samuel Cooper (ca. 1608–1672), Nicholas Dixon (active 1660–1708), Thomas Flatman (1635–1688), and Richard Gibson (ca. 1615–1690), had all died. At this same moment, miniaturists began to shift from painting on vellum: A fine parchment made of calfskin. A thin sheet of vellum was typically mounted with paste on a playing card or similar card support. See also table-book leaf. to ivory: The hard white substance originating from elephant, walrus, or narwhal tusks, often used as the support for portrait miniatures..2The use of ivory as a support instead of vellum was introduced by Rosalba Carriera (Italian, 1675–1757) in 1705. Bernard Lens (1682–1740) painted the first miniature on ivory in England in 1708. See Patrick J. Noon, “Miniatures on the Market,” in John Murdoch, Jim Murrell, Patrick J. Noon, and Roy Strong, The English Miniature (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), 171. Katherine Coombs suggests that the introduction of ivory underscores the diminishing prospects of traditional limning in the late seventeenth century.3See Coombs, Portrait Miniature in England, 76–77. She attributes this decline, in part, to market competition for small portraits and the evolving tastes of patrons.
This competitive market precipitated the emergence of a novel category of small portraits executed in plumbago: An archaic term for graphite used by seventeenth-century artists. It originates from the Latin word for lead, plumbum. See also graphite., “a medium influenced by and deriving authority from engravings”4Noon, “Miniatures on the Market,” 166. and the book trades of the Netherlands. Originally conceived as preparatory drawings for prints, plumbagos maintained utility in that role but also evolved into sought-after standalone works. Executed on vellum, they offered the stature of limnings at a lower cost.5Coombs, Portrait Miniature in England, 76.
Although Thomas Forster was not an engraver, he distinguished himself as a preeminent practitioner of plumbago. Employing a nuanced interplay of line thickness and direction, Forster adeptly conveyed fabric textures, skin tones, hair intricacies, and jewelry details in his sensitively rendered portraits, including the three shown here (Fig. 1, F58-60/53.1,2; and Fig. 2, F58-60/55.1,2). Forster used lines to articulate the crisp folds of satin of the women’s dresses and curved strokes that describe the rumpled cotton chemises they wear underneath (Fig. 1). He also communicated the character of his sitters’ faces, seen for example in the portrait of the aged man (Fig. 2) through his deployment of soft creases around the sitter’s nose and eyes that lend the appearance of an individual wizened through years of study and life. Forster’s detailed, monochromatic works, often commissioned by academics and writers, served as a foundational sources for engravings and appealed to fashionable women who appreciated the meticulous and sensitive nature of his work.
Despite the anonymity of Forster’s sitters, the visual resemblance between the woman in the present portrait and in figure 1 once prompted speculation that they were sisters.6The Philbrook Museum in Tulsa, Oklahoma, houses other works by Forster donated by the Starrs: Portrait of a Woman, 1705, 1958.17.1, https://www.nelson-atkins.org/starrsupp/Philbrook-Museum-of-Art/1958.17.1/ and Portrait of a Man, 1703, 1958.17.2, https://www.nelson-atkins.org/starrsupp/Philbrook-Museum-of-Art/1958.17.2/. The resemblance of the female sitters prompted a Philbrook colleague to suggest they could be related. See notes in curatorial files. However, the standardized ideals of beauty in the seventeenth century, coupled with the absence of any inscriptions, leave their identities—as well as that of the man—cloaked in uncertainty. The quest for further provenance details may eventually unveil their names7See the provenance for Portrait of a Woman (Fig. 1) at the object’s page in this catalogue, https://www.nelson-atkins.org/starr/contents/Volume-2/British/Stuart-Era/F58-60-53-1-2/ and for Portrait of a Man (Fig. 2) at its page, https://www.nelson-atkins.org/starr/contents/Volume-2/British/Stuart-Era/F58-60-55-1-2/., but for now, these remarkably nuanced likenesses endure as testaments to Forster’s skill and the intriguing intersections of art, academia, and societal aesthetics during this era.
Notes
-
Katherine Coombs makes this point in The Portrait Miniature in England (1998; repr., London: Victoria and Albert Publications, 2005), 76.
-
The use of ivory as a support instead of vellum was introduced by Rosalba Carriera (Italian, 1675–1757) in 1705. Bernard Lens (1682–1740) painted the first miniature on ivory in England in 1708. See Patrick J. Noon, “Miniatures on the Market,” in John Murdoch, Jim Murrell, Patrick J. Noon, and Roy Strong, The English Miniature (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), 171.
-
See Coombs, Portrait Miniature in England, 76–77.
Noon, “Miniatures on the Market,” 166.
-
Coombs, Portrait Miniature in England, 76.
-
The Philbrook Museum in Tulsa, Oklahoma, houses other works by Forster donated by the Starrs: Portrait of a Woman, 1705, 1958.17.1 and Portrait of a Man, 1703, 1958.17.2. The resemblance of the female sitters prompted a Philbrook colleague to suggest they could be related. See notes in curatorial files.
-
See the provenance for Portrait of a Woman (Fig. 1) at the object’s page in this catalogue and for Portrait of a Man (Fig. 2) at its page.
Provenance
Unknown owner, by 1950 [1];
Purchased from the unknown owner’s sale, Fine Objects of Vertu, Miniatures, Ivories, Gold Boxes, Etc., Sotheby’s, London, December 14, 1950, lot 97, as Six Plumbago Miniatures, by Leggatt Brothers, London, probably on behalf of Mr. John W. (1905–2000) and Mrs. Martha Jane (1906–2011) Starr, Kansas City, MO, December 14, 1950–1958 [2];
Their gift to The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO, 1958.
Notes
[1] In the Sotheby’s December 14, 1950, sale, “Other Properties” sold lots 53–100.
[2] Described in the sales catalogue as, “Six Plumbago Miniatures by Thomas Forster, all signed and dated between the years 1703 and 1715, the three men wearing wigs and the three ladies, probably sisters, all similarly posed, in burr-wood frames, oval, 4 1/2 in.” The annotated catalogue for this sale is located at University of Missouri-Kansas City’s Miller Nichols Library. The annotations are most likely by Mr. or Mrs. Starr. Lot 97 is annotated in pencil with “£65” written to the left of the lot number. According to an attached price list, Leggatt bought lot 97 for “£65.” Archival research has shown that Leggatt Brothers served as purchasing agents for the Starrs. See correspondence between Betty Hogg and Martha Jane Starr, May 15 and June 3, 1950, Nelson-Atkins curatorial files.
The group of six plumbagos that sold includes the three other Forsters in the Nelson-Atkins collection: Portrait of a Woman, 1704, F58-60/53.1,2; Portrait of a Cleric, 1704, F58-60/56.1,2; and Portrait of a Man, 1705, F58-60/55.1,2, as well as two now located at the Philbrook Museum of Art, Tulsa, OK: Portrait of a Woman, 1705, 1958.17.1 and Portrait of a Man, 1703, 1958.17.2. All are numbered 1–6 in pencil on the case back. Many thanks to Tiffany Roberts, Assistant Registrar at the Philbrook, who allowed us access to the Starr Miniatures’ object files.
Exhibitions
The Starr Foundation Collection of Miniatures, The Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, December 8, 1972–January 14, 1973, no cat., no. 32, as Unknown Lady.
References
Catalogue of Fine Objects of Vertu, Miniatures, Ivories, Gold Boxes, Etc. (London: Sotheby’s, December 14, 1950), lot 97, as Six Plumbago Miniatures.
Ross E. Taggart, The Starr Collection of Miniatures in the William Rockhill Nelson Gallery (Kansas City, MO: Nelson Gallery-Atkins Museum, 1971), no. 32, p. 16, (repro.), as Unknown Lady.
No known related works at this time. If you have additional information on this object, please tell us more.